Which route will give the auto industry its best chance of survival?

The U.S. auto industry is in turmoil, it has spent too many years building inefficient vehicles. Which route will give the auto industry its best chance of survival as the gasoline supply starts to dry up: hybrids, natural gas, hydrogen, fuel cells, electric, steam ? Explain your answer.


Water 4 Gas

3 Responses to “Which route will give the auto industry its best chance of survival?”

Aug 22nd at 12:59 am By: pedro7of9

1 you r wrong…last year the us makers made 1/2 the total sold 7 million
2 even Toyota is discounting hybrids because they cant sell them.
3 alternative energy is expensive…very expensive… 2…3..4 times as much as plain old gas and diesel
4 gas/oil supply is not drying up…hudge deposits off Atlantic coast…caloforina and in anwar…Brazil Just had a strike as big as Saudi Arabia,,,[Google/yahoo Brazil oil strike]

Aug 22nd at 1:21 am By: G6er

The problems in the us auto market can’t be put on their inefficient vehicles alone. Many of the companies also make very efficient vehicles. And furthermore, companies like Honda and Toyota are also making cuts, and showing losses. There are MANY reasons why us auto makers are failing and efficient cars is only a small small piece of that pie.
To answer your question, we have lots of oil still. Gas isn’t going anywhere any time soon. electic cars have their place, but are still not practical for places with cold climates. anyone who lives in a cold climate likes having heat in a car, and electric heat elements would waste all the battery life. plus, think of the large blackout on the east coast a few years back. Now imagine if everyone had to plug their car in. So ya, that’s no good. Hydrogen needs to be stored at like – 400 celcius or something rediculous. or stored under huge pressure. So it’s not practical and it’s not as stable as gas. Hybrids, many have pointed out, use large batteries which may end up negating the benefits they produce in gas efficiency. Natural gas, needs to be pressurized and is also a limited resource, so that’s a band aid solution, and for the time it would buy us, probably not practical for the infrastructure changes it would require. Steam needs something to make steam, coal is used alot, but that’s a worse problem. Fuel cells probably show the best promise, but they are still expensive and need much more research. Again, they use hydrogen and therefore, there are some factors that need to be overcome before it becomes a more practical alternative.

so in short. There is no good option at this point. Companies like GM need to just stick with efficient gas engines for the time being, and get restructured. get new contracts, better organization, pay parity ( which i believe they have or are getting), and better technology in their cars.

Aug 22nd at 2:13 am By: LeAnne

The best chance for the U.S. automakers has little to do with the auto makers themselves – and a great deal to do with consumer confidence in our economic system over the next few years.

Leave a Reply

*

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Stumbleupon button
All trademarks and copyrights owned by their respective owners and are used for illustration only
The Water for Gas Blog | H2O 2 Gasoline | H2O 2 Gas | Frontier Biofuel | Gas Price Forums | PG Gas | Ways to Conserve Gas | finOil | Gas Fraud | Hypermiling Blog | Gas Toll | Motorcycle Diary Online | Motorbike Topsites | Motorbike Blog | Motorcycle Gazette | Motorbike Gallery