surely this would make sense as the hydrogen fuel cell creates only water vapor as its waste product and the production of hydrogen costs no more then production of petrol/gas via the refinement of crude oil. As such it would cost no more to fuel you car with hydrogen then it would to fuel it with petrol/gas.

Furthermore, the oil production companies would not be losing out if they changed from the refinement of crude oil to the production of hydrogen. the Fuel companies would not lose out either as hydrogen costs the same as petrol/gas.

It seems to me the hydrogen is the clean alternative with no harmful waste product that is going to add to humanities carbon footprint and the oil and fuel companies would still be raking in as much profit as ever.

Everyone wins so why is hydrogen not the mandatory standard fuel for all new vehicles that comes off the production line.
See the problem is in another 100 years their will be nothing left the world to really care about saving at all. and no i wont be here but it is very quite possible that my children will and I dont want them to have become refugees of the world – having to move around to scrape what resources is left out of the a dead planet because people here and now were to stingy and lazy to bother getting rid of their presious cars
and before you say anything – I dont own a car, i used to own a car but got rid of it (actually i give it away) now i walk the 15 miles to university every morning and then the 15 miles back every evening. I have a bike for going to the shops and a large bag that goes on my back big enough to bike home with weeks shopping and I only ever use mass transport when there is no other choice but to do so

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 7 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Cells, Fuel, Hydrogen, mandatory, Vehicles

Ok, i was recently talking with some of my family and we were discusing a plan of how to convert most of the cars and Gas station into hydrogen. im not a tree huger of anything, i just think that we needs to get off the Arabs gas. so please take this into consideration, and respond back with if you think its a good idea or a bad idea and why.

So of corse you would have to conver the engines and that would be out on all new cars. that would take maby 10-20 to get all cars off Gasoline.

Then we could come up with a plan for tax cuts for eack station that has hydrogen pumps. then they would slowly all convert into hydrogen and we would pretty much forget gasoline.

Well its just a bare thought i know that some things need to be touched up, but i think that this is a good idea and that this could work somday with the help of others. i might start a blog. depending on the answers i get on this. so thanks, PLZPLZPLZ respsond with ur thoughts of yes or no and why.
Thanks, Jack

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 5 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Gasoline, Hydrogen, Instead

hybrid half gas half water

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 6 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: convertion, Hydrogen

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 4 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: 3070%, 49.99, Fuel, Hydrogen, Just, Kits, Really, Savings, sell, Water, Work

Lets say that its 20 years later (or whatever) and cars in the US are fueled by E85. Would we be better off, cost-wise, then we were buying gas? That is to say, could the US farming industry support a large demand of E85, and keep the prices low (and by low, I mean under $2).
Same question for Hydrogen: could it be produced with such volume to keep the prices low enough?
I guess the overall question is, are these alternative fuels capable of being more financially feasible then gas is to us now?

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: became, Could, Demand, Fuel, Hydrogen, industry, Large, Methods, primary, support, They