surely this would make sense as the hydrogen fuel cell creates only water vapor as its waste product and the production of hydrogen costs no more then production of petrol/gas via the refinement of crude oil. As such it would cost no more to fuel you car with hydrogen then it would to fuel it with petrol/gas.

Furthermore, the oil production companies would not be losing out if they changed from the refinement of crude oil to the production of hydrogen. the Fuel companies would not lose out either as hydrogen costs the same as petrol/gas.

It seems to me the hydrogen is the clean alternative with no harmful waste product that is going to add to humanities carbon footprint and the oil and fuel companies would still be raking in as much profit as ever.

Everyone wins so why is hydrogen not the mandatory standard fuel for all new vehicles that comes off the production line.
See the problem is in another 100 years their will be nothing left the world to really care about saving at all. and no i wont be here but it is very quite possible that my children will and I dont want them to have become refugees of the world – having to move around to scrape what resources is left out of the a dead planet because people here and now were to stingy and lazy to bother getting rid of their presious cars
and before you say anything – I dont own a car, i used to own a car but got rid of it (actually i give it away) now i walk the 15 miles to university every morning and then the 15 miles back every evening. I have a bike for going to the shops and a large bag that goes on my back big enough to bike home with weeks shopping and I only ever use mass transport when there is no other choice but to do so

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 7 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Cells, Fuel, Hydrogen, mandatory, Vehicles

I brought my outboard in for some minor maintenance. Upon its return I went to have a day on the water. The motor would not start. The fuel line was inserted into the motor but not reconnected. I was told this is standard practice at this location.

Not a big deal – just some wasted time etc.

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Boat, Fuel, line..., Marine, Mechanics, prior, reconnect, repair, returning, typically

To my understanding…Gas treatment evaporates water content from gasoline making for better mileage? Fuel injector just cleans off the grease buildup of the fuel injectors as it sprays out the gasoline? So this means the you’ll have to pour in a bottle of gas treatment for every tank of gas you filled?

Am i correct?

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Between, Cleaner, Difference, Fuel, Injector, Treatment.

I have searched the net and so far, I have not found a product that will inhibit the corrosion caused by ethanol in gasoline. It has been known for a long time that ethanol causes corrosion in mild steel due to higher water content and acidic contaminants such as formic and acetic acid that can arise during processing (as well as oxidation of the fuel during storage). I asked my fuel supplier this question, and he told me that ethanol does not cause corrosion. I then read an article that was written in 1991 that details the problem and names products such as Shell ALCOOL (marketed in Brazil). I would think that the refiners would put rust inhibitors in the fuel(silly me!).

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 6 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Being, corroded, Ethanol, exist, From, Fuel, Looking, Product, stop, Tanks

© admin for The Water for Gas Blog, 2010. | Permalink | 5 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: dollars, Five, Fuel, labor, pump, Shouldn't, They, towing, Water, worth